Who writes, approves and loads the VIP speech
A senior guest will speak, and nobody knows who writes the speech, approves it or loads the autocue.
The short answer
Speech clearance is a short, dated chain: who drafts, who reviews for the host institution, who approves for the speaker, which version is final and who loads it on the day.
The speaker's office decides whether it wishes to clear a speech, and how. Ask early, record the answer, and treat only the version approved by the named person as final.
Clarify who owns the words
Sometimes the speaker writes their own speech. Sometimes the speaker's office writes it, and sometimes the host institution is asked to supply points. Ask the speaker's office which applies and who gives final approval.
Your team's role is usually to carry drafts, track versions and make sure the approved text is the one in front of the speaker, the emcee and the technical team.
A clearance chain in five steps
- Request: ask the speaker's office whether a speech is expected and its approximate length. Also ask for any topic or points the host institution would like covered.
- Draft: whoever the speaker's office names writes the draft. If your team is asked to prepare background, supply facts only from sources the host institution has approved.
- Review: the draft goes to the named reviewers for the host institution. Give them a reply date and one place to send comments.
- Approve: the speaker or the speaker's office approves in writing. Label that text with a version and date as final.
- Release: the final text goes to the emcee, stage manager and autocue operator, and earlier drafts are withdrawn. Use the stage cue sheet builder to record who loads the final version.
Version control that holds on the day
- One file name pattern, such as speech name, version number and date, and one shared folder.
- A rule that only the named approver can mark a version final.
- A printed or saved copy given to the speaker only after approval.
- A fallback instruction if a last-minute change arrives, such as who accepts it and who tells the autocue operator.
- A note of the speaking time agreed with the speaker's office, shown on the run-of-show.
Legal and sensitive content in the speech
If a speech touches on legal, regulatory, policy or sensitive subjects, the speaker's office or the host institution's own reviewers decide what may be said. They review the correctness of the content.
Ask the host institution whether any other reviewer, such as its legal or communications team, needs to see the draft before approval.
Worked example · Fictional example
A clearance trail for an opening address
Fictional organisation and details, written to show the level of detail that is useful.
A fictional trade association invites a senior guest to deliver the opening address. The guest's office replies that the guest will bring a text. It asks that the association's president be sent a copy for factual review.
The secretariat records this in a clearance log: owner of the draft, reviewer, reply date and version. The guest's office sends version 1 five days before the event. The president's office returns two factual corrections, and the guest's office issues version 2 marked final. The secretariat gives that file to the emcee and the autocue operator and removes version 1 from the shared folder. It notes that any change on the day goes to the guest's office.
Use this yourself
Speech clearance log
Copy this table and keep one row per version. Only a row marked final may be loaded onto autocue.
- Record who requested each change and who approved it.
- Remove superseded versions from shared folders once a final version exists.
| Version | Date | Written by | Reviewed by (host) | Approved by (speaker side) | Status | Loaded by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Draft | |||||
| 2 | ||||||
| Final | Final |
Handle it in-house, or bring in help?
Your team can usually handle this when
- The speaker's office manages the text and you only need to receive and distribute it.
- One reviewer at the host institution who answers quickly.
- A technical team that confirms how the file will be shown.
Outside planning help earns its fee when
- Several speakers, each with different approval routes and deadlines.
- Drafts arrive late by different channels and nobody controls versions.
- The host institution wants several people to review and your team needs someone to chase and consolidate.
Want one person to track the speeches?
A conference project lead can ask each speaker's office how clearance works, keep the log, chase reviewers and make sure only the approved version reaches the emcee and the autocue operator. Share your brief on WhatsApp and we will reply with which level of support fits and what it would cover.
Questions organisers ask
Do we have to clear every speech?
That depends on the speaker's office and the host institution. Ask each one, record the answer and apply it consistently across speakers where you can.
Who corrects factual errors in a draft?
The reviewer named by the host institution flags them and the speaker or speaker's office decides what changes. Your team passes comments on and records the outcome.
What if the speaker changes the text on the day?
Agree beforehand who accepts a change and who tells the emcee and autocue operator. See speaker briefing generator for how to brief speakers on this rule.
Related resources
Content record: Written by the EventConsultant team to our editorial rules. Sources are listed on pages that rely on them.